<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Porter County Indiana Politics - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-97daa09f" type="application/json"/><link>http://portercountyindianapolitics.disqus.com/</link><description>Politics and debate in Northwest Indiana</description><atom:link href="http://portercountyindianapolitics.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:56:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: United States Senate Primary Poll</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/united-states-senate-primary-poll.html#comment-530011320</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I find you very talented. As you learn a lot..&lt;a href="http://www.oakleysunglasseshut.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;oakley gasket frames black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.oakleysunglasseshut.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;sunglasses hut&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oakleysun</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:56:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Iowa, A Close Race, and the Three Legged Stool</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/01/iowa-close-race-and-three-legged-stool.html#comment-527108378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney are tied in a very close race to win the you want to be the ”three legged stool of conservatism” that Ronald ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Furniture Shops</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 05:26:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: United States Senate Primary Poll</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/united-states-senate-primary-poll.html#comment-523350789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I thought was interesting in that the poll was identified as being independent even though 2 of the 3 entities behind the poll had already come out supporting Lugar. I am still scratching this old Swedish head to understand how they can claim being independent. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Leanne Hoagland-Smith &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leanne HoaglandSmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right to Life and Richard Mourdock...from a resident of a Flyover State</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/right-to-life-and-richard-mourdockfrom.html#comment-522789157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1mom4Christ</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-520571354</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Buzz, there's definitely more value in FB right now agree.  But I can see that a candidate with an engaging youtube or twitter profile can have an effect too.  The key is engaging, just pushing out posts or links to email blasts is real boring for readers.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daltonsbriefs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:20:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-519327253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I'm on Facebook (and there is some "vile blog" with some connection to me too).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there value in also doing twitter and a website?  I have to admit, I just don't get twitter, and I didn't feel I got a lot of value out of my website last time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buzzcut</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:23:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-519325793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for doing this, Steve.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buzzcut</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-518999415</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Thanks Ed, got it and added.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daltonsbriefs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 09:13:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-518961205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Missed my website &lt;a href="http://www.edmorales4council.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.edmorales4council.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks Steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Morales</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 08:44:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-517161172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Steve!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Olson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:38:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-517069055</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Thanks Eric, changing now&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daltonsbriefs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:33:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-517047361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve, no complaints., just an update my website address is &lt;a href="http://olsonforindiana.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;olsonforindiana.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Olson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Region's Social Media Politics</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/05/regions-social-media-politics.html#comment-516913048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok bring on the complaints about order of listing, missing links, misspelling candidates names, and all the other snide remarks please.  Would like to have a more complete list by end of day tomorrow.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daltonsbriefs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:31:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right to Life and Richard Mourdock...from a resident of a Flyover State</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/right-to-life-and-richard-mourdockfrom.html#comment-513847634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great job on this posting K...You summed it up well how evil planned childkillers is and how a great man like Mr. Mourdock deserve our support.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Olson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: School Funding Fairness - Ghosting Be Gone</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2011/02/school-funding-fairness-ghosting-be.html#comment-507237234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mitigating expenses on public &lt;a href="http://www.safelist.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;school funding&lt;/a&gt; should never be the core of education reform during fiscal bad times. Just throw in the numbers against military spending to justify these cutbacks! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stew Serendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Purdue censoring a blogger?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/purdue-censoring-blogger.html#comment-506828985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Purdue University is once again investigating Professor Eisenstein's free speech (this time, his blog) because someone has filed a formal complaint that it constitutes harassment/discrimination and/or retaliation.  Any Purdue keeps investigating this nonsense even though their policies explicitly state that it will not investigate anything that is considered free speech.  Purdue and its administrators are lying to the taxpayers of the State of Indiana as well as its students, faculty and staff -- and using tax dollars to violate Eisenstein's civil rights.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Concerncitizenv</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:08:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats for Mourdock?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/democrats-for-mourdock.html#comment-505949480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A desperate attempt by Democrats to help Lugar get elected, as he tends to vote with them in non-election years and is a yes-man for Barack Obama.   The rabbit is begging NOT to be thrown into the briar patch.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Radarbinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Political Blogs in Indiana today</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2010/04/political-blogs-in-indiana-today.html#comment-501572352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just saw this on Red State about Mourdock. Looks like he is in some real trouble...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redstate.com/starzandstripez/2012/04/18/mourdock-campaign-pillages-personal-info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.redstate.com/starza...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Political Blogs in Indiana today</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2010/04/political-blogs-in-indiana-today.html#comment-500410082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know the state of Indiana is not a huge hotbed of racial&lt;br&gt;tension, but, as an individual of color, racial equality is an issue that&lt;br&gt;matters to me. I am not an ideologue, and would consider myself a moderate. The&lt;br&gt;primary between the Republicans has largely been uninteresting to me. Why&lt;br&gt;should I care about two old white guys arguing? That all changed when Mr.&lt;br&gt;Mourdock wore a tie sporting the “stars and bars” of the old, racist south. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At first, I shrugged it off as a coincidence. I really get&lt;br&gt;annoyed when people play the race card right off the bat.  Then I began asking around to other people I&lt;br&gt;know, both white and black. It seems Mr. Mourdock does not have a good record&lt;br&gt;of hiring minorities during his time in office – one acquaintance actually used&lt;br&gt;the word “abysmal”. A few more questions turned up that he spends a lot of time&lt;br&gt;at libertarian conventions where state’s rights, nullification and disunion are&lt;br&gt;advocated…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I write this with as much objectivity as possible, but I&lt;br&gt;feel like there is more to the story on Mr. Mourdock. I won’t judge a man for&lt;br&gt;one slip up, but when the evidence starts coming together I can’t ignore it.&lt;br&gt;Unless he makes some big changes, the black community needs to be wary of Mr.&lt;br&gt;Mourdock, and his ties.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jared</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:34:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats for Mourdock?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/democrats-for-mourdock.html#comment-494609381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could very well be right, I had not considered that. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buzzcut</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats for Mourdock?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/democrats-for-mourdock.html#comment-494469708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said Buzz, Donnelly has no chance of winning in this cycle barring some kind of major scandal on our side.   This is merely a scare tactic late the game by the front runner to shore up his supporters.   I don't dislike Lugar as much as many, and will vote for him of course in November if he wins the primary ... but it would be nice to see him step aside and let a new face into the Senate on our behalf.    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daltonsbriefs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats for Mourdock?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/democrats-for-mourdock.html#comment-494443692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Donnelley does have a chance to win...Something that the talking head pundits are missing is this....If Lugar wins the primary, this republican and many like him will be voting for Donnelley, he's more conservative than "Dick" Lugar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bobbbyrttr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:30:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats for Mourdock?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/04/democrats-for-mourdock.html#comment-494340124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I'm not the most knowledgeable guy on Howey, I just know of him because I have read his column every Sunday for the last 5 years.  But he seems REALLY in the tank for Lugar.  Why is that?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have been to fundraisers for both Lugar and Mourdock this year, I have shaken both mens' hands, but only Mourdock took the time to speak for me for 10 minutes (about shale gas and the opportunities it brings to Indiana).  I believe that if you speak to Mourdock supporters, it is this personal touch that sways them his way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't believe for a minute that Donnelley has any chance.  Indiana has become a solid Republican state, it is actually trending more Republican, as we will see after this election.  Obama has done what no one else could for generations, turn Southern Indiana Republican.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buzzcut</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:43:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End of Another Embarrassing Era? Can we have a US Senator who LIVES in Indiana this time?</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2012/02/end-of-another-embarrassing-era-can-we.html#comment-484048895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting choice of words, Jfultz... &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuVpHT5aOwQ&amp;amp;context=C4398619ADvjVQa1PpcFMMkG8sfx3JL-bkjsSn98fNj86RfHfVkFQ=" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Starz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:22:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Porter County Courthouse</title><link>http://reasonbellpundit.blogspot.com/2010/08/porter-county-courthouse.html#comment-479877839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think rebuilding the dome (or something similar) would be a great idea. Did you know that before Porter County had a courthouse, court sessions took place in someone's home and the residents back then knew that wasn't right, so they banded together and raised 1250 dollars. I would definitely consider starting a donations fund to build the dome--did Doc Brown try to raise funds to save the clock tower in BTTF?? Just saying. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
